Bear 45/70
Regular Member
imported post
tjschul wrote:
I don't agree with anything Kalifornia does. They show an amazing ability to do very stupid and illogical things.
As to the dropability of a 1911, I don't drop my guns even with my old and badly screwed up hands. Besides if it's dropped muzzle down, the bullet is going down, isn't it?
The wife and I, they are actually hers andshe is a major Detonics fan (she hated the Pocket 9 she had though), are aware of how they are desirable andcollectiblethey and their value.
I hope Detonics does reborn out of the dust, but there have been way to many promises in the past that have died, frustrating many fans.
tjschul wrote:
Guess you don't agree with the designer of this fine pistol or the state of CA (drop tests). I suppose you have done your own testing to prove your wishful theory.
Wait a minute, I don't agree with the State of CA on a damn thing!!!!!
But... if the moron who carries his 1911 hammer down on a live round drops his firearm near me or mine, I'd be much happier knowing it was actually designed not to discharge.
Man that's an early pair you have, and collectable.Actually I have a Mark IV (bellevue gun) and the Mark VII (seattle gun). How about the news there is going to be another incarnation of Detonics (after the Detonics USA) soon.
I don't agree with anything Kalifornia does. They show an amazing ability to do very stupid and illogical things.
As to the dropability of a 1911, I don't drop my guns even with my old and badly screwed up hands. Besides if it's dropped muzzle down, the bullet is going down, isn't it?
The wife and I, they are actually hers andshe is a major Detonics fan (she hated the Pocket 9 she had though), are aware of how they are desirable andcollectiblethey and their value.
I hope Detonics does reborn out of the dust, but there have been way to many promises in the past that have died, frustrating many fans.