It's a good thing they are not reading this thread.
There is nothing of which we are ashamed.
If they don't get it at work, we will arrange for home delivery.
It's a good thing they are not reading this thread.
There is nothing of which we are ashamed.
I was thinking that if you want to surprise someone that it is hard to do when you advertise your intentions.
This is a highly orchestrated poker game - everything is not what it might appear to be and like the Man in Black said, "Know when to hold 'em and know when to fold 'em."
What do you presume our intentions might be?
Surely nobody thinks that those posting any details pertenant to this case other than time, date and principals thereto have not properly submitted them for consideration to that same attorney.
This is a highly orchestrated poker game - everything is not what it might appear to be and like the Man in Black said, "Know when to hold 'em and know when to fold 'em."
I was thinking that if you want to surprise someone that it is hard to do when you advertise your intentions.
What do you ...
I must have mis read the post I responded to.
Carry on. Good luck to all.
Thanks for all your work.
You'd be absolutely right if ...
In the beginning ...because the case was still being formed.
just it right when I publish this.
I though that was Kenny Rogers, not Johnny Cash.
..., but Poindexter started every reply with flailing arm gestures, hysterics and outrage that impressed nobody including the judge. ....
"What do you call ten thousand lawyers at the bottom of the ocean? -- a good start."
There's a big difference between "cop bashing" and "bringing to light specific actions by specific cops that need attention".I prefer swapping the word "lawyers" for the word "cops."
...
I prefer swapping the word "lawyers" for the word "cops."
But, they're a protected class around here. Odd, this case and all... Better not win, you'll be censored for cop-bashing... If you file a 42/1983 afterwards, well, you'll be banned for cop-bashing...
The only of those two groups that have come here and done us any good, are the lawyers. Yet, the joke about killing 10,000 of them is acceptable, while saying the same of those who necessitated these proceedings is not...
If you refuse to fight the enemy, you lose. If you won't even name your enemy, you've only shrunk further from your duty...
A term I have seen used in several unrelated instances is "an epidemic of isolated incidents".There's a big difference between "cop bashing" and "bringing to light specific actions by specific cops that need attention".
A term I have seen used in several unrelated instances is "an epidemic of isolated incidents".
I think that one is safely "public domain".I shall remember that and perhaps use it with your permission. :lol:
I shall remember that and perhaps use it with your permission. :lol: