OC4me
Regular Member
So a Trust (naming just about everybody as beneficiary) is the way to go if you want to share your toy?
I believe that I may be correct in thinking that going the individual owner route (which requires the LEO sign-off) means that only the owner (named on the Tax Stamp) gets to touch his/her suppressor (due to Michigan law making possession legal only for 'licensed' persons).
I worry that there is a Felony Trap here for otherwise innocent persons who are not the original Tax Stamp applicant or named beneficiary of a Trust*:
From the AG Opinion (edited for brevity):
. . . the possession . . . of a firearm silencer is permitted . . under MCL 750.224(1)(b) if the person is licensed . . . by the federal [BATF], as required by MCL 750.224(3)(c). Possession . . . by an unlicensed person is a felony . . .
*Having said that, I'm still not 100% convinced that even named beneficiaries of a trust (other than the original applicant) are covered because the other Trust beneficiaries wouldn't have gone through the background check, identity verification process, etc. described in the AG Opinion.
So beware . . . just saying! I hope someone more knowledgeable in NFA legal issues pertaining to Michigan law can step in and help shed some light on this issue, thanks!
I believe that I may be correct in thinking that going the individual owner route (which requires the LEO sign-off) means that only the owner (named on the Tax Stamp) gets to touch his/her suppressor (due to Michigan law making possession legal only for 'licensed' persons).
I worry that there is a Felony Trap here for otherwise innocent persons who are not the original Tax Stamp applicant or named beneficiary of a Trust*:
From the AG Opinion (edited for brevity):
. . . the possession . . . of a firearm silencer is permitted . . under MCL 750.224(1)(b) if the person is licensed . . . by the federal [BATF], as required by MCL 750.224(3)(c). Possession . . . by an unlicensed person is a felony . . .
*Having said that, I'm still not 100% convinced that even named beneficiaries of a trust (other than the original applicant) are covered because the other Trust beneficiaries wouldn't have gone through the background check, identity verification process, etc. described in the AG Opinion.
So beware . . . just saying! I hope someone more knowledgeable in NFA legal issues pertaining to Michigan law can step in and help shed some light on this issue, thanks!
Last edited: