G30Mike
Regular Member
So by your way of thinking j4l, if approached by a mugger with a gun, dont shoot him unless he shoots you first......hmmmm no thanks....
Last edited:
So by your way of thinking j4l, if approached by a mugger with a gun, dont shoot him unless he shoots you first......hmmmm no thanks....
I'd like to see you fight off a dog as described by the OP.
Better yet, since "no dog" is a problem, take on a police dog. (With their permission.)
I see your points... this was damn Cou-jo looking dog. but this dog looked very much of a 150 lb or more.
Fought a 130 lb greman shepherd with your bare hands? Punted it?? I seriously doubt that unless you are an extremely large and/or dangerous martial artist or something like that. Most humans would be hard pressed to handle a dog half that size. A dog does not equal a person and does not require the same danger as a human to kill.
Had it been my dog, you would have been recieving some return fire, without a doubt.
Not mine, unless you have an overwhelming urge to feel 230 grains of John Browning's Happy Pills entering you.
The over-reaction. It demonstrates a huge lack of sane, rational thinking,common-sense, and an ability to keep one's head under pressure.
Not sure what nonsense you folks have, law-wise in Missouri, but here his shooting the dog would have been a 3rd degree felony if it were not in fact (which in the OP's post, for the 1000000th time, it wasnt) attacking anyone at the time
Some dogs are just naturally aggressive. That is there Motivation.
second. your "i dont offer opinions, i offer reality." Is the most retarded thing i read. You can't comment on the reality of the OP statements. YOu werent there. Your statement of the OP being wrong iseven based of your opionion.
Why dont you drop this. Your not going to win this fight. And that is just patheic you even think of shooting someone defending themself against your dong. Based on your OPIONION that your dog couldnt possible be the aggressor. I like to see how that court case went.
Some dogs are just naturally aggressive. That is there Motivation.
second. your "i dont offer opinions, i offer reality." Is the most retarded thing i read. You can't comment on the reality of the OP statements. YOu werent there. Your statement of the OP being wrong iseven based of your opionion.
Why dont you drop this. Your not going to win this fight. And that is just patheic you even think of shooting someone defending themself against your dong. Based on your OPIONION that your dog couldnt possible be the aggressor. I like to see how that court case went.
If you haven't noticed, j4l is on a troll run tonight. No sane person believes that it's okay to kill people who defend themselves from attacking dogs. It's okay, j4l feels the same way we do, he just wants to get you all excited. Responding to him feeds his hunger...
Remind me again, where I made any claims of sanity? Didnt think so.
Also, remind of the part where the dog as originally posted attacked anything but the imaginations of a candyass? Didnt think so, either..
Your personal attacks on the OP don't help with you gaining any credit around here. Name calling is generally a good sign that you have no real argument to stand on, you have nothing left but to attack the OPs character.
The OP clearly demonstrated her "character" the moment she posted this nonsense.
Even aside from the being afraid of dogs issue, is the complete lack of maturity and irresponsibility of discharging that firearm in the manner she claims to have done so.
Had that round richochet'd off of something and struck the neighbor's kid, then what conversation would we be having right now?
Probably no conversation as that situation would have probably never been posted to begin with. I just hope you really were trolling with your "if you shot my dog id shoot you" response. Looks like you were to me now so Ill just keep the remainder of my comments to myself and hang on to the troll snacks....
I don't think he is trolling anymore... I think we've just got one of "those." You know, they're legally allowed to own a gun, but they're just one of "those" who just shouldn't.
I don't think he is trolling anymore... I think we've just got one of "those." You know, they're legally allowed to own a gun, but they're just one of "those" who just shouldn't.
This sounds really bogus...j4l said:This nonsense people hear in the news about dogs just mauling folks "for no apparent reason" is just that-nonsense.
...
All these nonsense stories you hear about folks being "suddenly" attacked by something= bogus.
This one happened in June, & had video of the officer standing on the hood of his car to get away from the dog + get a decent angle to shoot it. They attacked the owner, who wasn't harming them, then attacked more people.A pitbull attacked its owner Tuesday night in Waukesha as she attempted to kennel a second dog, according to a Waukesha Police Department news release.
...She suffered injuries to both legs and an arm, police said. The dog also bit the woman's 39-year-old male neighbor, who tried to help the owner.
After authorities arrived to help the dog's owner and the neighbor, the attacking dog tried to jump over a low picket fence to attack police officers.
...The owner was transported to a hospital by Flight for Life
So yes, dogs do attack with no provocation.A pit bull attacked and injured a 9-year-old boy, biting the child in the face and latching onto his arm, according to Madison police.
...The dog's owner also suffered puncture wounds on her hands when she pried the dog's jaws off the boy's arm.
Turn my back on a predator that's acting aggressive?? No way.Tail-up= good to go, no worries no matter what else the dog is doing/saying
Tail-down= maybe you should walk NOT RUN the other way.
A first sign of trouble may be a “gut” feeling...
Specifically watch for body language like direct and hard eye contact from your dog, the base of tail elevated above the level of the dog’s back, and hackles up. A warning growl should never be ignored.
For the 1000001th time, the dog was attacking.j4l said:here his shooting the dog would have been a 3rd degree felony if it were not in fact (which in the OP's post, for the 1000000th time, it wasnt) attacking anyone at the time, and would have been defensible for return fires by the owner.
j4l said:No need for shots unless one's actually chomping down on someone
Schlitz said:Ears back, growling, 3 feet away... this is attacking. That's like saying WELL THE MUGGER HAD HIS GUN OUT AND AIMED AT YOUR HEAD, BUT HE HADN'T SHOT ANYONE SO YOU CAN'T JUSTIFY DEADLY FORCE
If I saw a human behaving similarly (stalking me & making comments about raping me or slitting my throat, in place of growling, even after being told in no uncertain terms to leave me alone), I'd shoot the human.j4l said:This dog didnt attack ANYONE.
Nancy just saw a mean/scary-looking dog, and wet her panties.
+1Schlitz said:Your personal attacks on the OP don't help with you gaining any credit around here. Name calling is generally a good sign that you have no real argument to stand on, you have nothing left but to attack the OPs character.
IMHO no dog is a competitive factor for s full grown healthy man, killing it with your bare hands is not a particularly hard task. In the case of your father or others whom might be in ill health or lack the strength to fight it off, the situation is different.