• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

A2 not AnnArbor

taxwhat

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
800
Location
S E Michgan all mine, Michigan, USA
imported post

Supreme Court scrutinizes state and local gun control





Last Update: 3:12 pm








The U.S. Supreme Court is shown June 12, 2008 in Washington DC. (Mark Wilson, Getty Images)
WASHINGTON (AP) — Gun control advocates think, if not pray, they can win by losing when the Supreme Court decides whether the constitutional right to possess guns serves as a check on state and local regulation of firearms.

The justices will be deciding whether the Second Amendment — like much of the rest of the Bill of Rights — applies to states as well as the federal government. It's widely believed they will say it does.

But even if the court strikes down handgun bans in Chicago and its suburb of Oak Park, Ill., that are at issue in the argument to be heard Tuesday, it could signal that less severe rules or limits on guns are permissible.

The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence is urging the court not to do anything that would prevent state and local governments "from enacting the reasonable laws they desire and need to protect their families and communities from gun violence."

By some estimates, about 90 million people in the U.S. own a total of some 200 million guns.

Roughly 30,000 people in the United States died each year from guns; more than half of them are suicides. An additional 70,000 are wounded.

The new lawsuits were begun almost immediately after the court's blockbuster ruling in 2008 that struck down the District of Columbia's handgun ban. In that case, the court ruled for the first time that individuals have a right keep guns for self-defense and other purposes. Because the nation's capital is a federal enclave, that ruling applied only to federal laws.

The challenges to the Chicago area laws, which are strikingly similar to the Washington law, are part of an aggressive push by gun rights proponents in the courts and state legislatures.

Courts are considering many gun laws following the justice's 2008 decision. Massachusetts' highest state court is examining the validity of a state law requiring gun owners to lock weapons in their homes.

Two federal appeals courts have raised questions about gun possession convictions of people who previously had been convicted of domestic violence misdemeanors. A suit in Washington challenges the capital's ban on carrying loaded guns on public streets.

Lawmakers in several states are pushing for proposals favored by the National Rifle Association and other gun rights groups. The Virginia Legislature is considering repealing a law that limits handgun purchases to one a month. That law was enacted in 1993 because Virginia was the No. 1 supplier of guns used in crimes in other states. A separate proposal in Virginia would allow people with a concealed-weapon permit to take hidden guns into restaurants that sell alcohol, as long as those patrons don't drink.

Chicago is defending its gun laws at the high court. Mayor Richard Daley said a ruling against his city would spawn even more suits nationwide and lead to more gun violence.

"How many more of our citizens must needlessly die because guns are too easily available in our society?" Daley said at a Washington news conference last week that also included the parents of a Chicago teenager who was shot on a bus as he headed home from school.

Annette Nance-Holt said her only child, 16-year-old Blair Holt, shielded his friend when a gang member boarded a bus and began shooting at rival gang members.

"You might ask, 'What good is Chicago's handgun law if so many of our young people are still being shot?'" Nance-Holt said. "All I can say is, imagine how many more would be if the law were not there."

Gun rights advocates say such killings should serve as reminders that handgun bans and other gun laws do nothing to protect people who obey the law.

Indeed, 76-year-old Otis McDonald said he joined the suit in Chicago because he wants a handgun at home to protect himself from gangs.

The thrust of the legal arguments in the case is over how the Supreme Court might apply the Second Amendment to states and cities.

In earlier cases applying parts of the Bill of Rights to the states, the court has done so by using the due process clause of the 14th Amendment, passed in the wake of the Civil War to ensure the rights of newly freed slaves.

The court also has relied on that same clause — "no state shall deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law" — in cases that established a woman's right to an abortion and knocked down state laws against interracial marriage and gay sex.

This is the approach the NRA favors.

But many conservative and legal scholars — as well as the Chicago challengers — want the court to employ another part of the 14th amendment, forbidding a state to make or enforce any law "which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States."

They argue this clause was intended as a broad guarantee of the civil rights of the former slaves, but that a Supreme Court decision in 1873 effectively blocked its use.

Breathing new life into the "privileges or immunities" clause might allow for new arguments to shore up other rights, including abortion and property rights, these scholars say.

This approach might enable challenges to arcane state laws that limit economic competition, said Clark M. Neily III of the public interest law firm Institute for Justice. He pointed to a Louisiana law that protects existing florists by requiring a license before someone can arrange or sell flowers. The licensing exam is graded by florists, he noted.

"No reasonable person thinks that law has a legitimate purpose," Neily said. But he said, "Right now, once you get a law like this on the books, it's almost impossible to get rid of."

The case is McDonald v. Chicago, 08-1521.



[font="Arial, sans-serif"]©2010 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.[/font]
 

SpringerXDacp

New member
Joined
May 12, 2006
Messages
3,341
Location
Burton, Michigan
imported post

"Roughly 30,000 people in the United States died each year from guns;"

Roughly 45,000 people in the United States died each year from alcohol-relate traffic accidents. Maybe cars should be banned except for law enforcement and military.

:banghead:
 

lapeer20m

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
928
Location
Near Lapeer (Hadley), Michigan, USA
imported post

and half of those were suicides according to the article...

so that leaves 15K killed by others with guns. Of those 15K, how many were drug/gang related? or justifiable?

No doubt innocent people get killed by firearms, but in relation to other things that kill people, the number is pretty low.
 

eastmeyers

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2008
Messages
1,363
Location
Hazel Park, Michigan, USA
imported post

lapeer20m wrote:
and half of those were suicides according to the article...

so that leaves 15K killed by others with guns. Of those 15K, how many were drug/gang related? or justifiable?

No doubt innocent people get killed by firearms, but in relation to other things that kill people, the number is pretty low.

And what were the numbers in Vermont and Alaska? I assume MUCH LOWER! More gun restrictions = more gun deaths! You can only restrict the good guys, not the bad guys. Idiots.

God Bless
 

UCWT

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2009
Messages
119
Location
, , USA
imported post

2009:
Firearms are involved in
0.5% of accidental deaths nationally, compared to
motor vehicles (37%),
poisoning (22%),
falls (17%),
suffocation (5%),
drowning (2.9%),
fires (2.5%),
medical mistakes (1.7%),
environmental factors (1.3%), and
pedal cycles (0.7%).

Among children:
motor vehicles (41%),
suffocation (21%),
drowning (15%),
fires (8%),
pedal cycles (2%),
poisoning (2%),
falls (1.9%),
environmental factors (1.5%),
firearms (1.1%)
and medical mistakes (1%)

The firearm accident death rate is at an all-time annual low, 0.2 per 100,000 population, down 94% since the all-time high in 1904. Since 1930, the annual number of such deaths has decreased 80%, to an all-time low, while the U.S. population has more than doubled and the number of firearms has quintupled. Among children, such deaths have decreased 90% since 1975.
Today, the odds are more than a million to one, against a child in the U.S. dying in a firearm accident.
 

Bronson

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
2,126
Location
Battle Creek, Michigan, USA
imported post

UCWT wrote:
2009:
Firearms are involved in
0.5% of accidental deaths nationally, compared to
motor vehicles (37%),
poisoning (22%),
falls (17%),
suffocation (5%),
drowning (2.9%),
fires (2.5%),
medical mistakes (1.7%),
environmental factors (1.3%), and
pedal cycles (0.7%).

Among children:
motor vehicles (41%),
suffocation (21%),
drowning (15%),
fires (8%),
pedal cycles (2%),
poisoning (2%),
falls (1.9%),
environmental factors (1.5%),
firearms (1.1%)
and medical mistakes (1%)

The firearm accident death rate is at an all-time annual low, 0.2 per 100,000 population, down 94% since the all-time high in 1904. Since 1930, the annual number of such deaths has decreased 80%, to an all-time low, while the U.S. population has more than doubled and the number of firearms has quintupled. Among children, such deaths have decreased 90% since 1975.
Today, the odds are more than a million to one, against a child in the U.S. dying in a firearm accident.




i like the disclaimer at the bottom of the list,

NOTE: Firearms Statistics Include Gang Warfare, Self Defense Shootings and Criminals Killed by Police

Can you provide a link to this info?

Thanks,

Bronson
 

UCWT

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2009
Messages
119
Location
, , USA
imported post

i like the disclaimer at the bottom of the list,

NOTE: Firearms Statistics Include Gang Warfare, Self Defense Shootings and Criminals Killed by Police
EDIT
* this was quoted wrong had two different tabs going to cross reference data and came off the other site

sorry for the mix up
 
Top