Freedom1Man
Regular Member
This bill is to counter any gun control measures aimed at or semiauto weapons. Revolvers are in no danger at this point.
Sent from my DROID4 using Tapatalk 2
A revolver is a semi-auto.
This bill is to counter any gun control measures aimed at or semiauto weapons. Revolvers are in no danger at this point.
Sent from my DROID4 using Tapatalk 2
A revolver is a semi-auto.
It is not. 'specially not a single-action. "Semi-automatic" really refers to the reloading mechanism. A semi-auto reloads the chamber semi-automatically. A revolver has multiple chambers that are loaded/reloaded by the user. It is, however, a repeating firearm.
They way the Fienstien bill was worded revolvers would be considered semi-auto.
Then please cite her bill language.
Revolvers:
<snip> ... have features of military weapons such as the little hole in the end that does stuff. :banghead:
They way the Fienstien bill was worded revolvers would be considered semi-auto.
It does not apply to revolvers. Specifically, how many COMMONLY USED revolvers carry 10 rounds? Quit being such a knucklehead, there are real issues to concern ourselves with, without you stirring the pot simply to muddy the waters.
Sent from my DROID4 using Tapatalk 2
It does not apply to revolvers. Specifically, how many COMMONLY USED revolvers carry 10 rounds? Quit being such a knucklehead, there are real issues to concern ourselves with, without you stirring the pot simply to muddy the waters.
Sent from my DROID4 using Tapatalk 2
Sorry, I must have confused that bill for a different bill.
I thought I had read one that said something about being able to fire more than 1 round without re-loading.
Now I want to find that one again, I forget that these gun ban laws are all worded differently.
I stand corrected about the "Frankenstein" bill.
Way to take one sentence out of context and confuse the issue.
Sent from my DROID4 using Tapatalk 2
The real issue is that they want us all disarmed.
If this gets through they will use it to pass worse ones.
Ok, are you talking about fienstien's bill? Or HB1371? The only purpose of HB 1371 is to limit any federal gun control measures. It is not restrictive to the legally armed population in anyway. If you want to be concerned about something, there's plenty of things to be concerned about. Let's not borrow or imagine trouble where there is none.
Sent from my DROID4 using Tapatalk 2
That was about the Frankenstein bill.Ok, are you talking about fienstien's bill? Or HB1371? The only purpose of HB 1371 is to limit any federal gun control measures. It is not restrictive to the legally armed population in anyway. If you want to be concerned about something, there's plenty of things to be concerned about. Let's not borrow or imagine trouble where there is none.
Sent from my DROID4 using Tapatalk 2
His motive is to post a conspiracy in every post.
There more than a couple on here that fit this pattern. You can, as I have done, with Freedom1man, Adam3176 and a couple others, just put them on your ignore list. I will also ignore their PMs.I am beginning to see a pattern...
Sent from my DROID4 using Tapatalk 2
There more than a couple on here that fit this pattern. You can, as I have done, with Freedom1man, Adam3176 and a couple others, just put them on your ignore list. I will also ignore their PMs.
Well no, but some are hand cranked and others are full auto electric, technically these can be considered revolvers. lol
View attachment 9964
General Electric, "We bring good things to life." :banana:
View attachment 9965
View attachment 9966
Actually those are all breeds of Gatling guns. A revolver is defined as having a single barrel with multiple revolving chambers. Gatling guns have multiple revolving barrels AND chambers that share a common FCS & loading system. Hand-cranked Gatling guns are technically legal in Washington since they only fire one round for one activation of the fire control mechanism. Kesselring's up in Burlington has one in 45-70 for about 50 grand. Yet that is not to be confused with an "assault weapon" :banghead: