longwatch
Founder's Club Member - Moderator
imported post
Back onto topic, is the PLR-16 to much gun because of overpenetration? http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0BQY/is_2_47/ai_68704858
Going by the results of their testing I would say no depending on the load you were using. Penetration may run about the same as a .40S&W round. Ironically there seems to be more penetration out of a shorter barrel due to less fragmentation at lower velocities. Are the terminal effects better than a standard pistol round? I'm leaning towards yes. Although I think we are all familiar with the shortcomings of the .223 on targets, I would choose a .223 carbine over any handgun. The PLR-16 falls in between those choices, looks to me like a viable option when a rifle isn't handy or legal. It is a serious amount of firepower, just bring some earplugs if you are using it. http://www.ktrange.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=4323
Back onto topic, is the PLR-16 to much gun because of overpenetration? http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0BQY/is_2_47/ai_68704858
Going by the results of their testing I would say no depending on the load you were using. Penetration may run about the same as a .40S&W round. Ironically there seems to be more penetration out of a shorter barrel due to less fragmentation at lower velocities. Are the terminal effects better than a standard pistol round? I'm leaning towards yes. Although I think we are all familiar with the shortcomings of the .223 on targets, I would choose a .223 carbine over any handgun. The PLR-16 falls in between those choices, looks to me like a viable option when a rifle isn't handy or legal. It is a serious amount of firepower, just bring some earplugs if you are using it. http://www.ktrange.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=4323