cocked&locked
Member
The Dems want solar panels in the coronavirus Bill. Why don't the Republicans insist on National Reciprocity in the Bill?
The Dems want solar panels in the coronavirus Bill. Why don't the Republicans insist on National Reciprocity in the Bill?
Not this again. National Reciprocity passed by congress is and always has been smoke and mirrors.
Any state is free to not enforce , or even recognize an act of congress . And many would.
Thats just a fact. Please stop falling for that same old lie .
Yeah. I guess we can wait until the electrical grid of NY collapses, and the international airports are sold to the Mexicans because of the emergency need for hard currency, and two hurricanes hit back-to-back before they have an epiphany just like Puerto Rico did a few months ago. Yeah, we can keep waiting for that.Respecting "shall not be infringed" will obviate "national reciprocity."
Yeah. I guess we can wait until the electrical grid of NY collapses, and the international airports are sold to the Mexicans because of the emergency need for hard currency, and two hurricanes hit back-to-back before they have an epiphany just like Puerto Rico did a few months ago. Yeah, we can keep waiting for that.
Yeah. I guess we can wait until the electrical grid of NY collapses, and the international airports are sold to the Mexicans because of the emergency need for hard currency, and two hurricanes hit back-to-back before they have an epiphany just like Puerto Rico did a few months ago. Yeah, we can keep waiting for that.
I agree that waiting for states like NY to come to their senses on their own is an alternative. It did happen in Puerto Rico recently....... after a total collapse of the economy, infrastructure, law and order, several natural disasters, and 125 years. Yeah, you propose a viable alternative.
I agree that waiting for states like NY to come to their senses on their own is an alternative. It did happen in Puerto Rico recently....... after a total collapse of the economy, infrastructure, law and order, several natural disasters, and 125 years. Yeah, you propose a viable alternative.
There are no legitimate 'state's rights' regarding the right to keep and bear arms. The 2nd Amend. is complete.Simple fact. Congress being allowed to step on states rights by passing NR is the worst thing that could happen to the RTKABA .
And it will accomplish nothing.
There are no legitimate 'state's rights' regarding the right to keep and bear arms. The 2nd Amend. is complete.
There are no legitimate 'state's rights' regarding the right to keep and bear arms. The 2nd Amend. is complete.
Hyperbole is a poor debate tactic...Yeah. I guess we can wait until the electrical grid of NY collapses, and the international airports are sold to the Mexicans because of the emergency need for hard currency, and two hurricanes hit back-to-back before they have an epiphany just like Puerto Rico did a few months ago. Yeah, we can keep waiting for that.
PA needs to clean up its act...and the Gov ain't gunna do it...Pennsylvania Governor Revokes Emergency Gun Store Ban
Pennsylvania gun stores will remain open on a limited basis after Democratic governor Tom Wolf reversed course on his emergency coronavirus shut-down order on Tuesday. The governor will allow gun dealers to reopen their stores, but his order still severely restricts what they are allowed to do...freebeacon.com
Here is the complaint. https://freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/01-Complaint.pdfIn New Jersey, Governor Phil Murphy has not only banned gun stores from operating but also shut down the state's background check system, which effectively eliminates all legal sales of guns there. The Second Amendment Foundation and the New Jersey Second Amendment Society have filed a federal lawsuit against Murphy's ban and are hoping to expedite it through the courts.
Now read what I wrote that same day.17. In Heller, the Supreme Court did not intend "to cast doubt on . . . laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms," which are “examples” of “presumptively lawful regulatory measures.” Heller, 554 U.S. at 626-27 & n.26.