Well, the NRA has finally noticed our state, and has informed us of 3 pro-gun bills in the House. In case you were wondering, none of them are related to open carry...
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using Tapatalk
The NRA didn't have a fricken thing to do with the formation, submission or promotion of these bills.
They suck creel water!
I have said it for years and it still stands true. The NRA is not pro open carry!
Doc
I have said it for years and it still stands true. The NRA is not pro open carry!
Doc
The May issue of whom's newsletter?
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using Tapatalk
Well, the NRA has finally noticed our state, and has informed us of 3 pro-gun bills in the House. In case you were wondering, none of them are related to open carry...
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using Tapatalk
Making something legal does not automatically make the opposite of that thing illegal. Your post makes little to no sense. Can you explain a little more what your concern is?
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using Tapatalk
I have said it for years and it still stands true. The NRA is not pro open carry!
Doc
So, then, are you saying the are Anti OC? If so, please provide some credible evidence. Also, aside from this web forum, how many Pro 2A credible national organizations actively/openly support OC?
Just asking.
I think a more accurate description would be that they simply ignore the subject of OC. That does not necessarily make them anti-OC.
In order to be pro-OC, you need to have done something to promote it. So, the onus would be on someone that says they are pro-OC to prove it.
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using Tapatalk
1.Being passive is doing nothing;
2.I have asked the NRA-ILA to take a stance on this issue, no response.
3.My guess is they want this to be handled at the state level and if it gains traction, then they will get on board. However, if they don't like, it could be the kiss of death.....giving light to something they would prefer to not pass. That's politics! And a p1sser!
Can you show something a little more concrete?
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using Tapatalk
You might want to think about a few things in a different context sir.
1. They are NOT passive, they are very actively working in Jeff City as we type.
2. They gave you no response because they already announced it.
3. They killed it at the state level.
Now I know you may seek to take a different position, however, if you will look at the evidence, you may wish to reverse your position.
Take a close look at the DATE of the OP and the LINK included, you will find this posting started on 3-2-2012 and if you follow the link you will find a 3-2-2012 press release from the NRA speaking about the “flash bill” which HB 1369 never was a “flash bill”, however if you will bother to take a look, rep Cross entered an amendment to 1369 to convert it to a flash bill I believe that happened 3-5 or 3-6 and it was not complete until 3-7-2012.
Now perhaps some folks believe the NRA gods have ESP, but the more rational and logic based people consider the NRA announcing it 5 days in advance of it actually happening as very strong evidence that they indeed already had it in the works to be amended, once again fooling in MO politics.