guy with the gun seems to be the aggressor
He is almost in THEIR car AND he throws the first punch
was given the gun after he got his ass beat
The man was the aggressor.
He threw the first punch.
Shot off a couple rounds to show them hes still a man after he got his ass kicked.
all this with a toddler in his back seat?
With a temper like that, you don't have any business owning a firearm. IMO.
Think of it this way, what if one of the 2 guys also had a firearm, it would have been justified if at that point, when he started poppin off rounds, they shot him. THAT, is actually "fear for ones life". Not just 2 skinny ass kids using fists as weapons. That to me is just "fear of an ass beating".
All participants were at fault. At one point if the man had the gun he was within his rights to use force to defend himself even though he threw the first punch. Two against one and he was in the video trying to get away. The only reason the two stopped beating him was because the wife introduced the firearm, she was justified to defend him, she could have IMO legally used deadly force. After they broke off beating him the role reversed and he was then again in the wrong. ALL parties except the camera person and the wife should have been arrested!