I didn't see this posted anywhere, so here it is. To read the opinion open the attached file link titled "People v Clayton Scott Opinion.pdf"
http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=394266
Well that's a long read.
The biggest error I see is "A Fully Informed jury".
The Jury was never fully Informed of their rights, as to also "Judging the laws", that's where this case is
falling behind. If its a "Bad Law" they have the right and duty to say "Not Guilty" ! For the 2A.
Also this "Law 626.9 GFSZ" Is unconstitutional from the get go.
It discriminates the Citizens rights, because the Military and Guards, and police, can all carry on that
property. That makes this "Law" unequal to all persons.
All laws are to work FOR every one, in a free society.
Just because "Legislators pass laws don't mean there Lawful, under our Bill of Rights.
Also why would the court try to hide the "Private Property" exemption, when its up to the 12 judges
the jury to make that decision. Think about it.
Maybe we should all ( OC-ers) get a "Restraining Order" to protect our Liberties from the
"grave danger" of loosing it to foreign government agents !
All we have to do then is put up with the "Papers Please" program.
We could all LOC then anywhere at any time !
Robin47