BigDave
Opt-Out Members
I see that the AG explicitly calls it the "hunting and fishing" exemption, even though hunting and fishing are but example activities in the statute itself. I can easily see being arrested by an officer who thinks "hunting and fishing" is more than just a shorthand reference to the statute.
This is a prime example how statements get manipulated around to imply something other then stated ie "In your request you asked for clarification regarding the definition of RCW 9.41.060(8) which is popularly known as the “hunting and fishing” exception to concealed carry requirements in Washington State."
Do not get away with shorting or modifying what the law actually says;
(8) Any person engaging in a lawful outdoor recreational activity such as hunting, fishing, camping, hiking, or horseback riding, only if, considering all of the attendant circumstances, including but not limited to whether the person has a valid hunting or fishing license, it is reasonable to conclude that the person is participating in lawful outdoor activities or is traveling to or from a legitimate outdoor recreation area;
Would riding zip lines being a legitimate outdoor recreational activity? While not much like one of the listed activities in RCW 9.41.050, it is generally done outdoors in a forest setting and is arguably recreational. There seem to be many such companies offering this type of activity in Washington.
If only there were some major coaster parks in Washington. Riding roller coasters is a lawful outdoor activity after all
Engaging in a lawful outdoor recreational activity such as! is going to be your down fall when it comes to roller coasters as either a Judge or a Jury of your Peers will weigh in on if this activity is like hunting, fishing, camping, hiking or horseback riding. How would anyone of these be like a roller coaster? or zip lining for that matter. While they are both legal recreational activities they are not in my view like the activities described.