What is the overall effect of open carry on 2A public perception?

[BobCav]

imported post

Hawk and Hank at it again?

 

[HankT]

imported post

Hawk=

Moi =

 

[Hawkflyer]

imported post

HankT wrote:

Hawkflyer wrote:

HankT wrote:

...SNIP
We may have to sic MD Hawkflyer on Cut And Shoot! He'll be in for it then.

HankT wrote:

...Maybe we could get Hawk to avoid shooing her off by calling her a .....compromiser!...:dude:

Hmm.... Trolling.
Usually I am only attacked when I am part of the discussion, by people honorable enough to do it to my face.

I did post once that I thought you were being misjudged by many members here, and that you were not a troll. I stand corrected on that point.

Hmm, lose a  few arguments and you get all miffed again, eh?

Here, take a couple of these. It'll improve your disposition. Maybe.

 

So you agree that you are a troll?

 

[Tomahawk]

imported post

Hawkflyer wrote:

HankT wrote:

Hawkflyer wrote:

HankT wrote:

...SNIP
We mayhave to sic MD Hawkflyer on Cut And Shoot! He'll be in for it then.

HankT wrote:

...Maybe we could get Hawk to avoid shooing her off by calling her a .....compromiser!...:dude:

Hmm.... Trolling.
Usually I am only attacked when I am part of the discussion, by people honorable enough to do it to my face.

I did post once that I thought you were being misjudged by many members here, and that you were not a troll. I stand corrected on that point.

Hmm, lose a few arguments andyou get all miffed again, eh?

Here, take a couple of these. It'll improve your disposition. Maybe.

So you agree that you are a troll?

I've found, Hawk, that in arguments with Hank it's best just to let him have the last word and move on with the thread.

 

[HankT]

imported post

Hawkflyer wrote:

HankT wrote:

Hawkflyer wrote:

HankT wrote:

...SNIP
We mayhave to sic MD Hawkflyer on Cut And Shoot! He'll be in for it then.

HankT wrote:

...Maybe we could get Hawk to avoid shooing her off by calling her a .....compromiser!...:dude:

Hmm.... Trolling.
Usually I am only attacked when I am part of the discussion, by people honorable enough to do it to my face.

I did post once that I thought you were being misjudged by many members here, and that you were not a troll. I stand corrected on that point.

Hmm, lose a few arguments andyou get all miffed again, eh?

Here, take a couple of these. It'll improve your disposition. Maybe.

So you agree that you are a troll?

Oh, the old, "so you agree that you are compromising rights away,eh?"/"so, you agree that you are still/not beating your wife anymore?" gambit again?

Are you just stuck on that? Or is that the only one you know?

 

[Hawkflyer]

imported post

Tomahawk wrote:

...SNIP

I've found, Hawk, that in arguments with Hank it's best just to let him have the last word and move on with the thread.

+1
Agreed. People with ideas actually answer questions and contribute to the conversation. People without ideas argue the nature of the argument and declare victory. There are better things to do with the time.

Regards