Chicago police must pay 330k for home raid

[Jim675]

A federal jury says Chicago law enforcement must pay $330,000 to a family after officers shot their dog during a home raid that turned up no illegal activity.

This is wonderful news. Hopefully once shooting dogs goes out of style we who carry in our homes might be made a bit safer as well.

"According to NBC, the jury awarded $175,000 to Russell, $85,000 to his little brother, and $35,000 each to the brothers' parents. The officer who shot the dog owes $2,000 in damages, and his supervisor owes $1,000, according to NBC."

That will make an impact!

 

[Statkowski]

The officer who shot the dog owes $2,000 in damages, and his supervisor owes $1,000,

Hell has indeed froze over. A Chicago cop was actually held accountable for his actions. Amazing, simply amazing.

 

[Wolfgang1952]

Do the Cops that did the shooting have to pay the money or does Chicago pay the fine?

 

[Statkowski]

According to what was written in the news article, Chicago pays the bulk, but the officer and his supervisor pay on their own.

That'll learn them.

 

[KS_to_CA]

Chicago cops found erring? Told to pay? Is it a dream? WOW.

 

[Citizen]

I don't know this for a fact, but I'll bet shooting the dog had something to do with it.

Lotsa mistaken raids happen, very little accountability. The Good Faith Exception is the equivalent of saying "good enough for government work."

However, shoot a loveable Lab, when it isn't even being aggressive, and you've stood yourself out as a beast.

 

[JoeSparky]

Hell has indeed froze over. A Chicago cop was actually held accountable for his actions. Amazing, simply amazing.

I am waiting to hear IF those assessed the damages ACTUALLY PAY the damages!

 

[Dreamer]

The officer who shot the dog has to pay $2000?

He can make that up with one trip to the drug evidence locker....

 

[eye95]

I am waiting to hear IF those assessed the damages ACTUALLY PAY the damages!

Many public employees are covered against large civil settlements incurred during the course of public employment. I don't know if such is the case for these officers, but it is entirely possible that they will pay the damages, but not be out-of-pocket a single dime. If they have such coverage, at least one of the following consequences should be assessed: the officers lose coverage, the premiums for coverage are no longer paid by the city or union, the city or union reduces the share of premiums that it pays, or the insurance company raises premiums, with the officers paying the difference.

 

[Gunslinger]

They should have thrown the pos thugs in jail, as well. At least the dollar amount will catch the eye of other rogue SS vermin.

 

[Deanimator]

Many public employees are covered against large civil settlements incurred during the course of public employment. I don't know if such is the case for these officers, but it is entirely possible that they will pay the damages, but not be out-of-pocket a single dime. If they have such coverage, at least one of the following consequences should be assessed: the officers lose coverage, the premiums for coverage are no longer paid by the city or union, the city or union reduces the share of premiums that it pays, or the insurance company raises premiums, with the officers paying the difference.

It depends upon whether the damages are punitive in nature or not.

Chicago cops are NOT indemnified from punitive damages.

 

[randian]

A federal jury says Chicago law enforcement must pay $330,000 to a family after officers shot their dog during a home raid that turned up no illegal activity.

Sadly, Chicago law enforcement isn't paying that. Chicago's taxpayers are paying.

 

[markand]

I wonder how long the appeals process will drag on before the family actually sees some money.

 

[eye95]

It depends upon whether the damages are punitive in nature or not.

Chicago cops are NOT indemnified from punitive damages.

Cite? Do you know what insurance the do or do not have?

Admittedly, I don't know. However, the strong possibility exists that these cops will not have to pay a single dime out of their own pockets. Between the union, the PBA, and possibly even the city, they likely have some protection.

 

[Deanimator]

Cite? Do you know what insurance the do or do not have?

Admittedly, I don't know. However, the strong possibility exists that these cops will not have to pay a single dime out of their own pockets. Between the union, the PBA, and possibly even the city, they likely have some protection.

The SecondCityCop Blog has stated that they are not indemnified for punitive damages. This has been cited as one reason why the city has frequently settled in the past, to avoid trials in which individual Chicago cops could be found liable for substantial punitive damages.

 

[eye95]

The SecondCityCop Blog has stated that they are not indemnified for punitive damages. This has been cited as one reason why the city has frequently settled in the past, to avoid trials in which individual Chicago cops could be found liable for substantial punitive damages.

"Not indemnified for punitive damages" may merely mean that the city will not pay for them, not necessarily that they will have to pay out of their own pockets.

 

[since9]

This is wonderful news.

Yes it is! However, your title should have read: Chicago police must pay 330k for dog-shooting home raid. As it is, it leaves the central point blank.

 

[Deanimator]

"Not indemnified for punitive damages" may merely mean that the city will not pay for them, not necessarily that they will have to pay out of their own pockets.

Where else would the money come from?

The plain meaning of what I read was that the individual cop was on the hook for the punitive damages.

This came into play when Officer (later promoted to Detective) Alvin Weems was found civilly liable (along with the city) for $4.3 million for the unjustified shooting of an unarmed, unresisting, not under arrest man, Michael Pleasance. Weems recently committed suicide.

 

[eye95]

Where else would the money come from?

The plain meaning of what I read was that the individual cop was on the hook for the punitive damages.

This came into play when Officer (later promoted to Detective) Alvin Weems was found civilly liable (along with the city) for $4.3 million for the unjustified shooting of an unarmed, unresisting, not under arrest man, Michael Pleasance. Weems recently committed suicide.

Public employees are often protected by an insurance policy either provided by the government entity for which they work, their union, or themselves. When I was a public school teacher, such insurance was provided to me at no cost. It protected me from civil judgments. I suspect that the officers had such insurance, which will likely pay the judgment against them.

 

[Jim675]

I am content with the market selling insurance to officers for this type of situation. Those officers who make either consistently or dramatically poor decisions will see their rates climb just as poor drivers do.
They'll pay eventually or they'll give up that type of career. Gotta love the market working.