lsj.com being dishonest

[eastmeyers]

http://www.lansingstatejournal.com/...rriers?odyssey=tab|mostpopular|text|FRONTPAGE

This is an "article" about CADL TRO against MOC. If you goto the story page, and scroll down to the bottom you can click on comments, right there it shows that more than one hundred comments have been made. Once you click on it to actually read the comments there is about 30, they are deleting the ones they don't like, and banning some members that leave the truth. The only comments that are left (you can dig for other ones) are all pro CADL. WOW talk about integrity.

If I somehow got this wrong someone let me know.

Before you click:

After you click



I hope I am wrong, but it doesn't look like it.

 

[VW_Factor]

This is a common practice among sites on the internet. Would not surprise me at all.

 

[TheQ]

The locals call it the Lansing State Urinal for a reason.

 

[autosurgeon]

No surprise here. .. Milive does the same thing at times.

Sent from my Droid Flipside using Tapatalk

 

[Michigander]

Seems like the first amendment protects freedom of the press, so I can't argue with press agencies having the right to partake in various types of douche baggery. Just makes it all the more important to seek out the news agencies which respect both themselves and their audience.

 

[DrTodd]

http://www.lansingstatejournal.com/...rriers?odyssey=tab|mostpopular|text|FRONTPAGE

This is an "article" about CADL TRO against MOC. If you goto the story page, and scroll down to the bottom you can click on comments, right there it shows that more than one hundred comments have been made. Once you click on it to actually read the comments there is about 30, they are deleting the ones they don't like, and banning some members that leave the truth. The only comments that are left (you can dig for other ones) are all pro CADL. WOW talk about integrity.

If I somehow got this wrong someone let me know.

Before you click:

After you click


View attachment 5259
I hope I am wrong, but it doesn't look like it.

Did you add up the "replies" that are actually nested in the comments? I noticed some comments had 12-13 replies which were shown only when you clicked on the comment. I have neither the time nor inclination to do so, but if you really want to know, just add them up.
Also, would an airsoft "gun" be listed under a weapon? The state of Michigan does not consider it one. Not advocating the carrying of airsoft guns here, just noticed it was mentioned in the article.

 

[eastmeyers]

Co2ASOC