Is this a joke? I hope when Trump is president he will change this.
Am aware that there have been "discussions."
"Under these final rules, we will identify, on a prospective basis, individuals who receive Disability Insurance benefits under title II of the Social Security Act (Act) or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payments under title XVI of the Act and who also meet certain other criteria, including an award of benefits based on a finding that the individual’s mental impairment meets or medically equals the requirements of section 12.00 of the Listing of Impairments (Listings) and receipt of benefits through a representative payee."
Some folks think DJT is Santa and the Easter bunny... The alt-right think he is Jesus.. As for me, " I am loth to risk a conjecture about DJT. He is such an unintelligible human being that no rule of interpretation can possibly be found out by which to unravel his designs".
No he is not Santa, or the Easter bunny or Jesus, however the anti-christ is a possibility..
I think we're conflating two issues, with the same results...
The VA is ALREADY submitting names of Veterans to NICS who have been deemed unable to handle their affairs and have a fiduciary handle their benefits. Therefore they cannot own or handle any weapons or ammunition.
SSI is now beginning to do the same.
At issue here is the fact that these people have NOT been adjudicated as mentally incompetent, this being assigned a fiduciary can be done by a simple signature from a doctor, and rumor has it, from a Nurses recommendation as well.... Now I have great respect for doctors and nurses, but I do NOT believe they have the legal right to take anyone's rights away with out due process...
First of all "schiester[sic]" or more properly, shyster, is a denigrating epithet for a lawyer, and I don't believe Trump has any interests as a lawyer.
Then you must differentiate Trump from his businesses. Trump uses the law to his own ends, as he should, and his opponents call him a legal bully. Trump is named in less than 200 Federal cases and in less than 200 Florida Circuit Court cases. Of these and others, 500 cases against Trump have been dismissed, and in many more the public record of the resolution is less than clear for the complexity. Where the public record of the resolutions of his cases is clear, Trump has won 451 to 34 losses. This is well documented and available to anyone with a search engine.
The volume of Trump businesses legal issues is correlated with the volume of his businesses and indicative of nothing other than of our litigious society. I would compare it to the ease with which OCDO habitués admit to non-consensual interactions with cops, and which is to me astounding!
All that said, do not suggest that I have any great expectations of Trump, of those he has vastly satisfied the majority. He is a fork in the Future Knowledge Fallacy 'road', the "road less traveled by" the progressive multi-culturists and dingy snowflakes. Hell's a poppin' for them. Bwahahaha!