sprinklerguy28
Regular Member
imported post
SpringerXDacp wrote:
MY Mistake, I was tired and misread. I didn't catch the "without CPL"
SpringerXDacp wrote:
I don't understand what part of "if that possession is with the permission of the owner or an agent of the owner of that entity" is confusing. IMO, the intent here is very clear that a person OC'ing without a "license from this state or another state to carry a concealed weapon" or does not have permission from owner/agent is in violation of 234d.
You're saying that it's perfectly legal for an individual without a CPL to walk around OC'ing in a Wal-Mart, a store licensed to sell alcohol? If so...
First of all, one of the key words in 234d is "premises." Premises, by definition, includes the land the buildings/structures (parking lot of Wal-Mart) are placed. A person without a CPL or permission is already in violation of 234d before he or she even gets to the front door.
MY Mistake, I was tired and misread. I didn't catch the "without CPL"