Andie22012
New member
n
Last edited:
I am writing a argumentative paper on students rights to carry concealed guns on campus and would like to get some opinions on the subject from real people. If you would like to help me and do not mind being quoted in my paper here are a few questions I would like your opinion on.
1. Do you think college students should be able to protect themselves on campus by carrying [strike]concealed[/strike] guns?
2.If you do not agree with college students carrying guns on campus what do you suggest as a way to better protect them from school shootings?
3.One argument for students not being able to carry guns on campus is that college students sometimes use drugs and alcohol, but how do you feel about the fact that these same students are able to carry at other places like a grocery store? What makes them responsible enough to carry other places but to irresponsible to carry at school?
4.Do you think guns on campus would result in higher suicide rates?
5. Do you think [strike]concealed[/strike] guns on campus would distract from the learning experience?
6.Should students be able to defend themselves or should there safety be left up to officials?
7.Would [strike]concealed[/strike] carry on campus have prevented school massacres like the one at Virginia Tech?
8.What problems, if any do you think could arise from students having [strike]concealed[/strike] guns?
If he elects to pass, so should we as any post here will be considered as having come from OCDO - we do not speak before the public as the voice of OCDO, John does.
Considered by who? Certainly not anyone that knows the least about how public internet forums work. To attribute a member's post to "OCDO" would be a flat lie -- a gross error at best.
Not that I disagree about allowing someone like the founders of OCDO answer the questions... Just saying, it would be erroneous to attribute forum members' comments to OCDO as an organization. Even to say "an OCDO member" could be erroneous.
Well his edit notes say...
"Reason: sorry didn't know how to go about it, guess this wasn't the right way "
So I imagine he felt somewhat run-off. I don't sense pot-stirring, more jumping into project perhaps without thinking it through all the way and ended up asking a bunch of "defensive" folks a bunch of very serious, hard to answer "on the record" questions.
I am thankful if no false contribution has been made to "OCDO" in the past and I do understand that there is no control over the media types and the lows that they might find themselves stooping to in order to paint a negative picture.