scot623
Regular Member
Below is what I don't understand regarding the city's position.
Given: under preemption, the city doesn't have the privilege to restrict firearms carry in the city streets.
Given the above, how does this privilege manifest itself through the magic of words on paper via a contract with a third party? Imo, the city cannot delegate away a privilege they never had, no matter the size of the paycheck.
It is their contention, the liquor license and the seating capacity of the festival meet the standards set forth under 234d and 425o. Therefore they are not restricting firearms and more so than the state already does. At least that's their story and their sticking to it.