zigziggityzoo
Campaign Veteran
imported post
CV67PAT wrote:
Did the gun fire a round? Yes.
Was the shot intended? No.
Therefore, a negligent discharge occurred.
Negligence is defined as: Failure to take proper care in doing something.
He succeeded in caring for muzzle control, but he did not properly mind his trigger control.
Even if the shot was an accident (many negligent discharges are), it was still negligent.
CV67PAT wrote:
zigziggityzoo wrote:I asked you what evidence you have that it was a negligent discharge. You, not autosurgeon, are the one that made the quoted statement as if it were a matter of fact.CV67PAT wrote:
As autosurgeon said: There's no such thing as an accidental discharge in my book. Anytime you didn't intend for the gun to go off and it does, it's due to negligence.zigziggityzoo wrote:What evidence do you have that allowed you to come to the conclusion that the incident was a negligent discharge as opposed to possibly having been an accidental discharge?It's sadly somewhat true.
After the picnic ended and most all (but about 3 people) had left, a member who had attended had a negligent discharge in the parking lot.
Did the gun fire a round? Yes.
Was the shot intended? No.
Therefore, a negligent discharge occurred.
Negligence is defined as: Failure to take proper care in doing something.
He succeeded in caring for muzzle control, but he did not properly mind his trigger control.
Even if the shot was an accident (many negligent discharges are), it was still negligent.